The Supreme Court's recent decision lifts restrictions on aggressive immigration tactics in California, sparking controversy over racial profiling and constitutional rights. Critics argue it undermines personal freedoms and targets vulnerable communities.
In a contentious ruling, the US Supreme Court allows immigration raids in Los Angeles to continue, sparking outrage among civil rights advocates. The decision is seen as a significant victory for President Trump’s deportation agenda.
In a controversial move, the Supreme Court has blocked a ruling that limited immigration stops by federal officers in Los Angeles, drawing sharp dissent from Justice Sotomayor over potential racial profiling.
The U.S. Supreme Court has endorsed President Trump's hardline immigration tactics, allowing federal agents to conduct controversial raids in Southern California. Critics warn this could lead to racial profiling and constitutional violations.
In a bold move, Chicago's Mayor Brandon Johnson signs an executive order countering Trump's immigration policies, restricting police cooperation with federal agents. This action raises questions about constitutional authority and public safety.
President Trump has signed an executive order mandating prosecution for those who burn or desecrate the American flag, sparking backlash from free speech advocates and raising questions about constitutional rights.
In a surprising social media post, President Trump suggests he may revoke Rosie O'Donnell's U.S. citizenship, igniting debates over constitutional rights and political rivalry. O'Donnell responds fiercely, highlighting the absurdity of the claim.
In a landmark ruling, a federal judge has declared President Trump's executive order targeting law firm Susman Godfrey unconstitutional. This marks a significant legal victory against Trump's campaign against prominent law firms.
In a landmark ruling, a federal judge has ordered the release of Mahmoud Khalil, a pro-Palestinian activist detained under Trump’s immigration crackdown. This decision raises significant questions about constitutional rights and free speech.
In a divisive ruling, the Supreme Court has upheld Tennessee's law banning gender-affirming care for minors, igniting fierce debates over youth rights and medical ethics. Advocates argue it violates equal protection, while supporters hail it as necessary for child safety.
