In response to escalating protests over lawmakers' excessive perks, Indonesia's President Prabowo Subianto has announced cuts to state-funded allowances. Demonstrators, fueled by recent events, demand deeper reforms.
In a bold move, over 180 current and former FEMA employees have voiced their dissent against the agency’s leadership, prompting action from the Trump administration. The implications are significant for emergency management.
In a bold move, Tulsi Gabbard announced the revocation of security clearances for 37 national security officials, accusing them of politicizing intelligence. Critics fear this could silence dissent within the intelligence community.
As the Fed prepares for a crucial meeting, President Trump faces disappointment as interest rates are likely to remain unchanged. With rising tariffs and inflation concerns, a debate brews among Fed governors about the need for a rate cut.
In a surprising turn, President Trump has responded to pressure from his loyal MAGA supporters regarding the Epstein case, signaling a shift in his stance amid internal dissent.
The Federal Reserve has proposed easing key capital rules that could empower banks to operate more flexibly, despite dissent from some officials concerned about potential risks to financial stability.
The U.S. Supreme Court has allowed President Trump's administration to resume deporting migrants to third countries without giving them a chance to plead their cases, igniting fierce dissent among liberal justices and raising serious human rights concerns.
The Supreme Court intervened to stay a lower court ruling that allowed migrants to challenge deportation orders, raising concerns over due process and human rights for those facing potential torture.
In a landmark ruling, a federal judge has ordered the release of Mahmoud Khalil, a pro-Palestinian activist, from immigration custody, challenging the Trump administration's crackdown on dissent against Israel's actions in Gaza.
In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court upheld a Tennessee law banning gender-affirming care for trans youth, igniting fierce debate over transgender rights and discrimination. Chief Justice Roberts and conservative justices justified the ruling, but dissenters raised alarm over its implications.