In a significant legislative move, the California Legislature has passed two controversial measures aimed at increasing accountability among law enforcement officers. Following a summer marked by reports of masked federal agents detaining immigrants in Los Angeles, these new laws, known as Senate Bills 627 and 805, were approved in the final days of the 2023 legislative session.
Senate Bill 627 is designed to prevent local, out-of-state, and federal law enforcement officers from wearing face coverings while on duty. This measure aims to enhance transparency and public trust by ensuring that officers are readily identifiable during their interactions with the community. Meanwhile, Senate Bill 805 complements this by requiring law enforcement personnel to clearly display their identification.
State Senator Scott Wiener, a Democrat from San Francisco and the lead author of SB 627, stated, “As we navigate through this troubling era of mass deportation and a Supreme Court enabling authoritarian practices—including racial profiling of Latino communities—California must take the lead in ending the operations of secret police.”
The passage of these measures was not without contention. The votes fell along strict party lines, with Republicans opposing the measures. Police unions have also voiced their disapproval of the proposed mask ban. GOP Senator Tony Strickland from Huntington Beach criticized the bills, calling them a “reckless anti-law enforcement proposal” that jeopardizes the safety of officers and their families.
As California lawmakers approach the end of their session, they are expected to extend their work until Saturday to finalize several last-minute proposals. Those that successfully pass will be sent to Governor Gavin Newsom for his approval or veto, while those that do not will be shelved for the year.
Several other significant proposals are currently awaiting Governor Newsom's decision:
Regulation of AI Chatbots: SB 243 seeks to impose stricter regulations on online chatbots powered by artificial intelligence, aiming to protect young users from potential risks. Increase in Car Dealer Fees: SB 791 proposes raising the maximum fees car dealers can charge for document processing from $85 to $260. Wage Increase for Incarcerated Firefighters: AB 247 would boost the minimum wage for incarcerated individuals fighting wildfires to $7.25 an hour. Protection for Abortion Pill Distributors: AB 260 aims to safeguard California pharmacists, doctors, and hospitals from penalties associated with dispensing the abortion pill mifepristone to out-of-state patients. Management of Invasive Species: AB 764 would facilitate the process for hunters and landowners to cull invasive mute swans. Ban on Plastic Glitter: AB 823 proposes a pioneering ban on the sale of personal care products containing plastic glitter or microbeads. Support for Bees: AB 1042 would establish a health program for honey bees, offering grants to beekeepers and farmers for projects that support bee populations.To stay updated on legislative activities, consider signing up for My Legislator, a weekly report that tracks what your state legislators are saying, voting on, and introducing. The beta version runs until September 15, and user feedback is encouraged.
Join us on September 24 in Sacramento to celebrate CalMatters’ 10th anniversary and Dan Walters’ 50 years of covering California politics. Attendees will have the opportunity to hear directly from Dan as he reflects on his extensive career. Additionally, participants can enter a raffle to win a private dinner with Dan. Members can use the code “MEMBER” for a discounted ticket.
In other news, CalMatters highlights the covert influence of tech giant Google in shaping California policies through lobbying efforts. Reports reveal that Google orchestrated a campaign to dilute a proposed regulation, with its involvement remaining concealed until uncovered by investigative reporting.
Furthermore, farmers in the San Joaquin Valley are looking to pivot from traditional agriculture to solar energy as drought conditions persist. Proposed legislation aims to incentivize this transition, although it has sparked debate among the agricultural community regarding land use and economic impacts.
Stay connected with CalMatters for comprehensive coverage and analysis of California's legislative developments and political landscape.
