The Wireless Power Consortium (WPC), the organization responsible for the Qi wireless charging standard, has officially certified the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 for Qi 2.1 support. However, there are some discrepancies regarding the device's charging capabilities that have raised eyebrows among tech enthusiasts and consumers alike.
While the WPC lists the Galaxy Z Fold7 as only supporting the Basic Power Profile (BPP) at 5W, many speculate that this is an incomplete representation of the device's true capabilities. In comparison, the Galaxy Z Fold6 is certified to support the Extended Power Profile (EPP) at 15W, leading many to believe that the successor will at least maintain, if not exceed, this power output.
The introduction of Qi 2.1 brought new profiles designed for devices with cases, particularly focusing on the Magnetic Cover Power Enhancement (MCPE) and the Magnetic Cover Power Magnet (MCPM). Although both profiles utilize magnets, they serve distinct functions. The MCPM is tailored for phones that have built-in magnets, enhancing the magnetic field with additional "feedthrough" magnets embedded in the case for a more robust attachment. On the other hand, the MCPE is compatible with both BPP and EPP devices that lack built-in magnets, enabling them to operate in Magnetic Power Profile (MPP) mode, which is the magnetic variant of Qi charging.
The certification page for the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (model number SM-D637U) does not provide any details beyond the BPP designation, which many believe to be misleading. It appears that the WPC has opted not to use Samsung's typical model designations, as evidenced by the differences in naming conventions. For instance, the Galaxy Z Fold6 is labeled as “SC-55E”, while the Z Fold Special Edition is “SM-D269N” and the Z Fold5 is “SM-D617S.” None of these align with Samsung’s standard “SM-F” numbering for its foldable devices.
The placeholder image labeled “Coming Soon” on the certification page indicates that the information provided is still incomplete. However, speculation suggests that Samsung may not fully embrace the complete magnetic charging experience with the Galaxy Z Fold7. Instead, it is likely that the device will follow the strategy employed with the upcoming Galaxy S25, which utilizes Magnet Cases that operate under the MCPE profile. For example, a case from Spigen demonstrates this approach effectively.
In conclusion, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 has received Qi 2.1 certification, the lack of clarity regarding its charging profiles raises questions among consumers. As the device nears its release, further clarification from Samsung and the WPC will be crucial for potential buyers looking to understand the full capabilities of this innovative foldable smartphone.
