The Supreme Court may grant President Trump unprecedented power to fire FTC commissioners, challenging a 90-year-old legal precedent. Key justices voice concerns about the implications for presidential authority.
The Supreme Court appears ready to allow President Trump to dismiss a Democratic FTC leader, a move that could reshape the boundaries of executive power and challenge a 90-year-old legal precedent.
The Supreme Court hears a pivotal case that may alter the independence of federal agencies. At stake is the legality of Trump's firing of FTC Commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter, potentially reshaping the balance of power in Washington.
The Supreme Court will review President Trump's executive order aimed at ending birthright citizenship, a right guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. This case could reshape American citizenship laws and have lasting implications for millions.
The Supreme Court has agreed to review President Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship, a move that could reshape American immigration law and constitutional rights. A ruling against Trump would uphold longstanding legal precedents.
President Trump is pushing to send National Guard troops to cities like Chicago and Portland to combat crime and illegal immigration, sparking lawsuits and debate over presidential authority. Legal experts weigh in on this unprecedented move.
In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court has ruled in favor of President Trump, allowing him to remove FTC member Rebecca Slaughter as they review her case. This ruling challenges a long-standing precedent on federal agency protections.
In a groundbreaking ruling, a federal judge dismissed a DOJ lawsuit against Maryland's federal judges, asserting that the case undermines judicial independence and precedent. This decision highlights ongoing tensions between the executive and judicial branches.
In a surprising move, a federal judge has refused to unseal grand jury transcripts from the Epstein investigation, citing longstanding legal precedents and concerns for victim safety. This marks the third judge to deny such a request, intensifying calls for transparency amidst ongoing public outcry.
In a historic turn, the Supreme Court may reconsider its 2015 Obergefell ruling on same-sex marriage, sparked by Kim Davis's appeal. This case could reshape marriage rights in America, as conservative groups push for change.