In a groundbreaking ruling, a federal judge dismissed a DOJ lawsuit against Maryland's federal judges, asserting that the case undermines judicial independence and precedent. This decision highlights ongoing tensions between the executive and judicial branches.
In a surprising move, a federal judge has refused to unseal grand jury transcripts from the Epstein investigation, citing longstanding legal precedents and concerns for victim safety. This marks the third judge to deny such a request, intensifying calls for transparency amidst ongoing public outcry.
In a historic turn, the Supreme Court may reconsider its 2015 Obergefell ruling on same-sex marriage, sparked by Kim Davis's appeal. This case could reshape marriage rights in America, as conservative groups push for change.
In a landmark ruling, the US Supreme Court has upheld a controversial Texas law requiring age verification for accessing pornography websites. This decision has sparked debates on free speech and minors' protection, as over a dozen states consider similar measures.
The Supreme Court's final rulings include a high-stakes case on birthright citizenship and its implications. Will the court uphold constitutional norms or redefine them under Trump's influence?
In a landmark unanimous decision, the Supreme Court ruled that families affected by wrong-house raids can sue law enforcement. This case stems from a 2017 incident involving Trina Martin's family, raising questions about police accountability and sovereign immunity.
A federal judge has ruled that President Trump can use the Alien Enemies Act to deport Venezuelan gang members, marking a significant legal precedent amid ongoing controversies surrounding immigration policies.
In a groundbreaking courtroom moment, an Arizona man sentenced for manslaughter heard the AI-generated voice of his victim, Christopher Pelkey, asking for forgiveness, setting a new legal precedent.
A federal judge has ruled against the Trump administration's attempt to deport Venezuelans under the Alien Enemies Act, arguing it exceeds the statute's intended use. This landmark decision could reshape immigration policy and legal interpretations of wartime laws.
