BREAKINGON

Menendez Brothers' Habeas Corpus Petition Denied: New Evidence Dismissed

2/21/2025
New evidence emerges in the Menendez brothers' case, but the District Attorney denies their habeas corpus petition based on the credibility of the evidence. A controversial legal battle ensues as the brothers seek justice for alleged abuse and murder convictions.
Menendez Brothers' Habeas Corpus Petition Denied: New Evidence Dismissed
Explore the latest developments in the Menendez brothers' case as new evidence of alleged abuse and trauma surfaces. Discover the legal challenges they face in seeking justice amidst a complex murder trial and the pursuit of freedom through resentencing and clemency.

Los Angeles County District Attorney's Stance on Menendez Brothers' Habeas Corpus Petition

Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman has requested the court to deny the Menendez brothers' habeas corpus petition. The petition, filed in 2023 by Erik and Lyle Menendez, seeks a new trial or dismissal of their case based on new evidence not previously presented.

New Evidence at the Heart of the Petition

The petition focuses on two new pieces of evidence. First, a letter written by Erik Menendez to his cousin Andy Cano, eight months before the murders, details alleged abuse by his father. Although Cano testified about the abuse during the trial, the letter, which could have supported Cano's testimony, was only discovered several years ago, according to the brothers' attorney.

The second piece of evidence involves allegations from Roy Rossello, a former member of the boy band Menudo, who claimed in 2023 that he was raped by the brothers' father, Jose Menendez.

Hochman's Argument Against the Petition

Hochman explained that for a habeas petition to succeed, it must meet several criteria: the evidence must be new, timely, credible, admissible, and undiscoverable at the time of the trial. Hochman argued that the letter to Cano does not meet the credibility standard.

"If this letter truly existed, the defense counsel would have absolutely used it at trial," Hochman stated, emphasizing that it would have corroborated testimony from Cano and Erik Menendez.

Testimony and Trial Details

Erik Menendez testified extensively during his second trial about the abuse he and his brother endured from their father. He disclosed to Cano at ages 12 or 13, but the letter was never discussed in either trial. Erik Menendez claimed he learned of the letter in 2015, yet the habeas motion was not filed until 2023.

The defense argued that the jury was tasked with determining whether the brothers were molested by their father. However, Hochman stated the jury's focus was on whether the brothers conspired to kill their parents and if they acted in self-defense.

Roy Rossello's Allegations and Admissibility

According to Hochman, Rossello's claims fail the admissibility standard because the brothers were unaware of these allegations until recently, so the claims couldn't have influenced their mindset during the crime.

Response from Justice for Erik and Lyle Coalition

The Justice for Erik and Lyle Coalition, advocating for the brothers' release, condemned Hochman's dismissal of the new evidence. They expressed disappointment, stating that Hochman ignored the trauma the brothers experienced and dismissed the psychological impact of the abuse.

"To suggest that years of abuse couldn’t have led to the 1989 tragedy is not only outrageous but also dangerous," the coalition stated, emphasizing the lasting impact of abuse.

Conviction and Sentencing of the Menendez Brothers

The Menendez brothers were convicted in 1996 for the murders of their parents, Jose and Kitty Menendez, committed in 1989. Lyle and Erik, then 21 and 18, admitted to the killings, claiming self-defense after years of abuse, while prosecutors argued their motive was financial gain. They received life sentences without parole.

Other Paths to Freedom

Besides the habeas corpus petition, the Menendez brothers are pursuing two additional avenues for freedom. One is through resentencing. Former LA County DA George Gascón recommended modifying their sentence to 50 years to life, making them eligible for parole immediately due to their ages during the crime. Hochman, however, has not decided on his stance regarding resentencing.

The second path is through clemency. The next resentencing hearing is scheduled for March 20 and 21.

Breakingon.com is an independent news platform that delivers the latest news, trends, and analyses quickly and objectively. We gather and present the most important developments from around the world and local sources with accuracy and reliability. Our goal is to provide our readers with factual, unbiased, and comprehensive news content, making information easily accessible. Stay informed with us!
© Copyright 2025 BreakingOn. All rights reserved.