The Supreme Court is set to hear pivotal cases from West Virginia and Idaho that could determine the fate of transgender athletes in girls' and women's sports, amidst a national debate on inclusion and fairness.
The Supreme Court is set to hear crucial cases from West Virginia and Idaho regarding state laws that ban transgender athletes from competing in women's sports. This decision could redefine the legal landscape for transgender rights in athletics.
The Trump administration demands California change its policies on transgender girls competing in sports, threatening enforcement action if they refuse. California stands firm on its inclusive stance.
The U.S. Department of Education has concluded investigations into California's educational bodies for Title IX violations, accusing them of discrimination against female athletes by allowing male participation in women's sports.
A group of eight women athletes has filed an appeal against the NCAA's $2.8 billion settlement, claiming it violates Title IX by favoring male athletes in revenue distribution. This landmark case could reshape gender equity in college sports.
A landmark federal court ruling allows colleges to directly pay athletes, marking a transformative shift in college sports. With new payment caps and potential legal challenges ahead, the future of student-athlete compensation is set to evolve dramatically.
In a groundbreaking decision, a federal judge has approved a settlement allowing college athletes to be directly compensated by their schools for the first time. This landmark change will reshape college sports and athlete rights.
A 16-year-old transgender athlete's success at the California state track and field championship has ignited a fierce legal standoff as the Trump administration threatens California over its trans athlete policy. Will the state comply?
In a bold statement, Governor Janet Mills responds to the DOJ's lawsuit over Title IX violations, framing it as a battle for states' rights and the Constitution. She vows to defend Maine against federal overreach.
In a dramatic legal showdown, Judge Jackson's ruling halts the Trump administration's efforts to dismantle the Consumer Bureau, igniting a fierce debate over federal funding and agency oversight. Key implications for employees and agency operations unfold as the fight continues.
