The US Supreme Court has allowed the Trump administration to temporarily halt hundreds of millions in medical research grants, raising concerns over the impact on diversity and inclusion initiatives.
In a contentious ruling, the Supreme Court has allowed the Trump administration to slash nearly $800 million in NIH grants aimed at studying diseases affecting minority, gay, and transgender communities, amidst ongoing legal disputes.
In a controversial 5-4 ruling, the Supreme Court temporarily halted $783 million in NIH research grants, igniting debates over the Trump administration's funding cuts and the implications for scientific research.
NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya reveals that millions in mRNA research contracts were canceled due to public distrust. He argues that without credibility, mRNA technology can't serve its health mission.
In a landmark ruling, a federal judge has ordered the Trump administration to restore over $584 million in suspended UCLA research grants, a move that could impact hundreds of researchers and vital studies.
HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has sparked outrage by canceling $500 million in mRNA vaccine research grants, citing questionable data. Experts warn this could hinder public health efforts and the future of vaccine technology.
The NIH's Jay Bhattacharya argues that public distrust led to the cancellation of mRNA vaccine contracts. This statement contrasts with Health Secretary Kennedy's claims about vaccine safety and efficacy.
Bank of America posted mixed results for Q2, with earnings beating estimates at 89 cents per share but revenue missing expectations, leading to questions about future growth amid changing interest rates.
Richard Schlueter, battling metastatic cancer, faces a desperate wait for experimental treatment as NIH staff cuts delay his therapy. His story sheds light on the critical impact of workforce reductions on patient care.
In a landmark decision, a Boston federal judge declared the Trump administration's termination of NIH diversity-related grants illegal, citing racial discrimination and restoring over $1 billion in funding. This ruling could reshape future funding for minority and LGBTQ research.
