In a groundbreaking move, the Supreme Court orders a new trial for Richard Glossip, a death row inmate in Oklahoma, due to prosecutorial misconduct. The decision reignites the debate over the death penalty and the integrity of the justice system.
Take part in CNN's feedback survey to share your thoughts and possibly win exciting prizes! Your contribution is valued and appreciated.
In a surprising turn of events, the US Supreme Court has ordered a new trial for Richard Glossip, a death row inmate from Oklahoma convicted in a 1997 murder case. The decision follows a series of legal battles and revelations casting doubt on Glossip's guilt.
Supreme Court overturns Richard Glossip's murder conviction and death penalty after 25 years, citing constitutional rights violations. New trial ordered in a true-crime legal drama in Oklahoma.
High drama as the Supreme Court orders a new trial for Richard Glossip, who has long maintained his innocence in a controversial murder case. Dive into the twists and turns of the justice system in Oklahoma.
DA Nathan Hochman rejects Menendez brothers' plea for new trial as resentencing approaches, dismissing evidence of sexual abuse and facing condemnation from family. Recent Netflix series and clemency petition add new layers to the case.
Los Angeles District Attorney rejects Menendez brothers' plea for a new trial based on abuse claims, citing lack of sufficient evidence.
New evidence emerges in the Menendez brothers' case, but the District Attorney denies their habeas corpus petition based on the credibility of the evidence. A controversial legal battle ensues as the brothers seek justice for alleged abuse and murder convictions.