As US senators receive a classified briefing on Trump's bombing of Iranian nuclear sites, concerns grow over transparency and military action without congressional approval. Key figures like Chuck Schumer and Rand Paul voice their opinions on the legal implications.
House Speaker Mike Johnson argues that the War Powers Act is unconstitutional and opposes a resolution to limit U.S. military action in Iran. Tensions rise as Trump’s recent strikes complicate the situation.
A group of veteran House Democrats has announced their support for a War Powers Resolution following recent U.S. air strikes against Iran. They emphasize the constitutional requirement for Congressional approval before military action.
President Trump's recent airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities without congressional approval have ignited a fierce debate over constitutional authority. Lawmakers express concern over the president's unilateral actions, raising questions about the balance of power in U.S. military engagements.
In the wake of President Trump's recent strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, legal experts debate whether he had the constitutional authority to act without Congressional approval. Some defend his actions under Article II, while others raise concerns about the War Powers Resolution.
President Trump has ordered U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, raising questions about presidential authority and the need for congressional approval. Dive into the legal debates and implications of this controversial decision.
In a significant ruling, the 9th Circuit Court has frozen President Trump's mass firings directive at multiple agencies, marking a setback for his plans to reshape the federal government. The court emphasized that such drastic measures require congressional authorization.
Senator Adam Schiff and other Democrats are calling for an inquiry into the Defense Department's role in Trump's acceptance of a luxury jet from Qatar, raising serious constitutional and security concerns.
A federal judge has temporarily halted the Trump administration's plan to lay off thousands of federal workers, citing the need for Congressional approval. This ruling could reshape the future of government employment.
A California judge has issued an emergency order to pause the Trump administration's significant cuts to the federal workforce, citing the need for Congressional cooperation. This ruling comes amid multiple legal challenges against the president's efforts to shrink government size.
