In a significant legal ruling, a federal appeals court has decided that National Guard troops in Illinois will remain under federal control but cannot be deployed while the appeals process unfolds. This decision is part of an ongoing legal battle between the Trump administration and state officials over troop deployment amid protests.
In a pivotal ruling, a federal court has kept Oregon National Guard troops under federal control while preventing their deployment in Portland. This decision maintains the current status and aims to avoid escalating tensions amid ongoing protests.
In a significant legal setback for President Trump, a federal appeals court has ruled that Lisa Cook, a Federal Reserve governor, can participate in upcoming meetings, maintaining her role despite Trump's attempts to dismiss her over unfounded fraud allegations.
In a stunning legal blow, a federal appeals court has upheld a defamation lawsuit against Donald Trump, ordering him to pay over $83 million to writer E Jean Carroll. This ruling adds to Trump's ongoing legal troubles and raises questions about presidential immunity.
In a significant ruling, a federal appeals court upheld an $83.3 million jury verdict against Donald Trump for defaming writer E. Jean Carroll. The court criticized Trump's ongoing attacks and affirmed Carroll's claims of emotional harm.
In a significant ruling, a federal appeals court has upheld the $83 million defamation verdict against Donald Trump, concluding he failed to prove grounds for reconsideration. The court found that Trump's actions were egregious, affirming Carroll's right to damages.
The fate of Donald Trump's controversial tariffs hangs in the balance as a federal court rules they may be illegal. Businesses could receive refunds, but the economic implications are complex and uncertain.
In a landmark decision, a federal appeals court has halted President Trump's attempt to swiftly deport Venezuelan migrants, rejecting claims of an 'invasion' and upholding the rule of law.
A federal appeals court has ruled against President Trump’s sweeping tariffs, claiming he overstepped his authority. This decision poses a major setback for his trade policies aimed at boosting the U.S. economy.
In a surprising decision, a federal appeals court ruled that Trump did not have the authority to impose most tariffs on foreign products. What does this mean for the future of U.S. trade policy?
