The White House announced on Tuesday that agency leaders have the discretion to decide whether their employees must respond to an email from the Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency. This email requests federal employees to detail their work accomplishments from the past week. The directive has sparked a growing debate as several agency heads, including Kash Patel and Tulsi Gabbard, have advised their employees against responding.
Musk’s email specifies a deadline for federal employees to respond by 11:59 p.m. on Monday, requiring them to list five bullet points describing their accomplishments over the previous week.
Numerous high-ranking officials from agencies such as the FBI, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Defense, Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and others have instructed employees not to respond to Musk’s email. This directive comes despite these agencies being largely run by key Trump allies. Confusion arose within the Justice Department, with varying directives on whether employees should respond to the email. Similarly, other agencies like the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the National Science Foundation have expressed uncertainty regarding the email's legitimacy.
Despite the controversy, some agencies like the Department of Transportation, Treasury Department, and General Services Administration have directed employees to respond. The Secret Service and Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency also instructed their staff to comply, with specific form responses provided for completion.
Although Musk’s email advises staff not to disclose classified information, experts warn of potential security risks. Intelligence officials suggest that a large volume of responses could expose sensitive details, even if no classified information is shared. Many federal employees are restricted from sharing work details with third parties without proper authorization, raising concerns about compliance with existing rules.
While not as vocal as Democrats, some Republican lawmakers have voiced concerns about Musk's directive. Rep. Mike Lawler and Sen. John Curtis expressed skepticism about the feasibility of firing non-compliant employees, highlighting the personal implications for federal workers. Sen. Lisa Murkowski criticized the directive for lacking respect and dignity towards the public workforce.
The administration has indicated that responding to the email is voluntary, leaving the consequences for non-compliance uncertain. The Office of Personnel Management faces logistical challenges in processing responses, and Musk may encounter legal challenges if he attempts to terminate employees. Labor unions, such as the AFGE, have vowed to contest any unlawful terminations.
Musk’s initiative is part of the broader objective to reduce the federal workforce and cut spending, amidst widespread controversy. The Department of Government Efficiency, under Musk’s leadership, has faced criticism for attempts to access sensitive government information and has been challenged legally over its authority.
For more insights, explore the following articles:
Elon Musk Says Federal Employees Must Explain Their Work Or Be Fired White House And Treasury Department Agree To Block DOGE From Personal Taxpayer Data, Report Says Is Elon Musk Running DOGE? Trump Administration Tries To Downplay Billionaire’s Authority In Court