Elon Musk, the billionaire entrepreneur, recently stirred controversy by threatening federal workers with termination unless they responded to an email detailing their weekly accomplishments. On Monday, Musk stated that employees who failed to respond would have another opportunity to do so at the discretion of President Donald Trump. This development follows a growing number of agency heads, including Kash Patel and Tulsi Gabbard, advising their employees not to respond to Musk’s email.
Musk’s directive gives federal employees until 11:59 p.m. on Monday to submit a response. They are required to list five bullet points describing their accomplishments over the past week.
Several high-ranking officials from key agencies have instructed employees not to respond to Musk's email. These agencies include the FBI, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Defense, Office of the Director of National Intelligence, U.S. Courts System, State Department, Department of Energy, Department of Homeland Security, and Department of Justice. Despite being led by Trump allies like Patel, Rubio, and Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., there was confusion within the Justice Department regarding the directive. While initially advising against responding, the DOJ later sent guidance indicating employees should comply, only to retract it later, as reported by CNN.
Additionally, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the National Science Foundation have raised concerns about potential phishing attempts and are seeking further guidance.
Musk claimed he had received numerous positive responses from federal workers. Agencies like the Department of Transportation, Treasury Department, General Services Administration, and the Office of Management and Budget have directed their staff to respond. The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and Secret Service have also complied, with the latter providing a form response detailing employees' weekly accomplishments. The National Resources Conservation Service and Ed Martin, U.S. Attorney in Washington, D.C., also encouraged a response, albeit with an emphasis on confidentiality and duty.
While Musk’s email instructs staff not to disclose classified information, experts warn that mass responses could pose security risks. Intelligence officials suggest that adversaries could piece together sensitive details from the responses, even if no classified information is shared. Federal employees are often restricted from sharing work-related information with third parties without authorization.
While Democrats have criticized the email request, some Republicans have expressed reservations. Rep. Mike Lawler questioned the feasibility of firing employees who don't respond, citing union contracts. Sen. John Curtis urged Musk to show compassion, emphasizing the real-life impact on federal workers. Sen. Lisa Murkowski criticized the email, advocating for dignity and respect towards public workers.
Currently, the administration suggests that responding to the email is voluntary, but it's unclear what consequences may follow the deadline. The Office of Personnel Management faces logistical challenges in processing responses, and Musk could encounter legal challenges from workers or labor unions if terminations occur. Federal employees have civil service protections, complicating Musk's ability to enforce the directive.
Musk’s directive contradicts the administration's legal stance, which downplays his authority. The Trump administration is contesting a lawsuit that challenges Musk's authority, arguing he lacks formal government decision-making power. Despite leading the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), Musk’s role is under scrutiny, with Trump’s lawyers distancing him from formal agency responsibilities.
Musk’s directive is part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to reduce the federal workforce and cut government spending. The Department of Government Efficiency, led by Musk, has faced criticism for attempting to access sensitive government information and for its role in mass layoffs. Legal challenges have been filed against DOGE, limiting its access to sensitive data and questioning its authority.
For more insights, read the following articles:
Elon Musk Says Federal Employees Must Explain Their Work Or Be Fired White House And Treasury Department Agree To Block DOGE From Personal Taxpayer Data, Report Says—Here’s What To Know Is Elon Musk Running DOGE? Trump Administration Tries To Downplay Billionaire’s Authority In Court