In 2003, the landscape of literature and book reviewing was markedly different from today. If you happened to mention at a social gathering, such as a summer barbecue, that you were a professional book reviewer, the reaction you received was often one of pity. The other men on the patio would cast sympathetic glances your way, as if your career choice was a misguided venture.
During this time, one of the most common questions posed by curious partygoers was, “What did you think of ‘The Da Vinci Code’?” This popular novel by Dan Brown had become a cultural phenomenon, sparking widespread discussions and debates. For many, it represented a significant shift in the publishing industry and the public's perception of literature.
Being a book reviewer in 2003 often came with a stigma. Many people viewed it as a less serious profession, leading to awkward conversations at social events. The notion that reviewing books could be a fulfilling career was not widely accepted, and the genre of popular fiction, particularly works like ‘The Da Vinci Code’, was often dismissed by literary elites.
Despite the skepticism surrounding book reviewing, popular fiction began to gain traction among readers. Books like ‘The Da Vinci Code’ not only generated significant sales but also initiated discussions about the role of genre fiction in modern literature. This shift indicated a growing acceptance of diverse literary forms, paving the way for greater appreciation of book reviewers who championed such works.
Looking back, the perception of book reviewing has transformed considerably since 2003. Today, book reviewers are recognized for their expertise and ability to guide readers through the vast literary landscape. The cultural conversations sparked by bestselling novels like ‘The Da Vinci Code’ have contributed to a more inclusive understanding of literature, allowing book reviewers to thrive in an ever-evolving industry.
