For most NFL teams, a player’s holdout typically creates the necessary pressure to secure a favorable deal. However, the Bengals are not your average franchise. Their approach reflects a strong emphasis on power and precedent, dismissing the notion that a player’s absence would prompt any substantial change. This was evident during Trey Hendrickson’s training-camp holdout, where the Bengals demonstrated their indifference to his absence.
Facing escalating fines of $50,000 for each day missed, it became clear that Hendrickson needed to return. The Bengals were unlikely to waive these fines, regardless of their potential willingness to negotiate. By staying away, Hendrickson risked losing game checks of approximately $877,000 per week once the regular season commenced. Ultimately, the financial implications would have exceeded that amount, considering the team’s best offer for a new contract.
Reports suggested that the Bengals were prepared to offer Hendrickson around $28 million per year, a significant jump from his current base salary of $15.8 million. If Hendrickson had continued to hold out, he could have faced a situation similar to that of Haason Reddick last season, where the team allowed a player to miss valuable time without compromising their stance.
By reporting to camp, Hendrickson acknowledged that his holdout was ineffective. While he might be tempted to limit his participation in practices, the Bengals have shown they are not inclined to accommodate such behavior. Last year, they enforced fines on wide receiver Ja'Marr Chase during his hold-in, reinforcing their stance on player accountability. If Hendrickson chooses not to participate in practice, he may face similar repercussions.
Moreover, if Hendrickson claims an “injury” to justify his absence from practice, the Bengals could challenge that decision. The critical point is that now that he has reported, leaving again could have dire consequences. Should he miss five consecutive days, the Bengals have the authority to shut him down for the entire season, leaving him with no financial compensation.
While this scenario might present short-term challenges, it serves to reinforce the Bengals’ message: they are in control. Their approach signals that they will dictate terms, emphasizing their authority over the players. For Hendrickson, the most pragmatic course of action now is to prepare for the upcoming season and consider accepting the best offer the Bengals present before Week 1, even if it falls short of his initial expectations.
In conclusion, Hendrickson’s decision to report to training camp illustrates the realities of player negotiations within the Bengals organization. While he may view this situation as a defeat, it is essential to recognize that, given the Bengals' established practices, it was the only viable option available to him.
