Grading a draft immediately after its conclusion is like complimenting a chef before the meal is served. While initial impressions may hint at the ingredients, true evaluation requires time to assess how each team performs over the next few years. It will take at least three years to fully understand how the 32 NFL teams fared in this draft. However, we can identify the different approaches each team took, whether it be going for the best available talent, addressing specific team needs, or gambling on long-term potential despite character concerns.
The Arizona Cardinals made a significant move by selecting Walter Nolen, a splashy defensive tackle, in the first round. This pick marked the culmination of an impressive offseason focused on enhancing Arizona's defensive front. Nolen's potential carries some risk, but his raw talent is undeniable. With Jonathan Gannon at the helm, known for developing defenders, he becomes an intriguing investment. Additionally, cornerback Will Johnson offers top-10 talent at a discounted price as the No. 47 overall pick. While the improvements to Arizona's defense are exciting, questions linger about whether the offensive line received sufficient attention. Overall Grade: B-
The Atlanta Falcons approached the draft with clear goals, focusing primarily on improving their pass rush. Head coach Raheem Morris invested in two first-round picks, selecting dynamic sack artists Jalon Walker and James Pearce Jr.. Both players have immediate impact potential, complemented by a new safety tandem of Xavier Watts and Billy Bowman Jr.. Given their limited number of picks, the Falcons' strategy leaves little room for error. Overall Grade: C+
Ravens GM Eric DeCosta successfully addressed positional needs by selecting Malaki Starks, who offers versatility as both a cornerback and safety. His addition alongside star Kyle Hamilton adds depth. Despite off-field concerns, the Ravens' selection of CFB sack leader Mike Green at No. 59 shows confidence in their culture. The draft also included standout talents like Emery Jones Jr. and Carson Vinson, who could bolster the team's offensive line. With eight selections on Day 3, this draft class stands out for its quality and depth. Overall Grade: A-
The Buffalo Bills made a strategic move by selecting Maxwell Hairston, a cornerback known for his speed and playmaking ability, which addresses a critical need on defense. The Bills opted for a blend of speed and toughness throughout their draft, focusing on defensive players while also adding depth at tight end and cornerback. With this approach, the Bills are eyeing a Super Bowl run. Overall Grade: A
The Panthers prioritized supporting quarterback Bryce Young, selecting wide receiver Tetairoa McMillan, who has the potential to become a reliable target. The addition of Nic Scourton at No. 51 adds to their offensive arsenal. Carolina's draft also highlighted the dual-threat potential of running back Trevor Etienne and safety Lathan Ransom, both of whom could become integral to the team's future. Overall Grade: B-
The Chicago Bears recognized the impact of a playmaking tight end and selected Colston Loveland, who fits their offensive scheme. Their focus on wide receiver was unexpected, but the pick of Luther Burden III adds explosiveness. Additionally, Ozzy Trapilo and Shemar Turner add pro-ready talent to bolster the roster. The Bears' draft strategy appears promising, especially with their intriguing picks on Day 3. Overall Grade: A-
The Bengals continued their trend of gambling on raw athleticism by selecting Shemar Stewart, intended as insurance for potential trades involving veteran players. Their draft strategy signals a shift in focus, with selections aimed at fortifying both the offensive and defensive lines. While the emphasis on defense is clear, the Bengals also secured valuable depth with selections like running back Tahj Brooks. Overall Grade: B
The Browns' draft was marked by a mix of solid picks and puzzling decisions. While Mason Graham at No. 5 is a strong addition, trading opportunities for blue-chip talent raised eyebrows. The selections of quarterbacks Dillon Gabriel and Shedeur Sanders were particularly confusing, considering their existing roster. Although there is potential in their draft class, questions remain about its overall impact. Overall Grade: C-
The Dallas Cowboys made a notable shift in strategy, selecting strong blockers like Tyler Booker to bolster their offensive line. While they added quality players, their lack of focus on playmakers raised concerns. The addition of speedster Jaydon Blue in the fifth round offers some excitement, but the Cowboys need to enhance their receiving corps beyond CeeDee Lamb. Overall Grade: B-
The Denver Broncos surprised many by selecting cornerback Jahdae Barron instead of a running back. This addition strengthens their defense, particularly opposite Patrick Surtain Jr.. The Broncos also added talent in various positions, including running back RJ Harvey and wide receiver Pat Bryant, both of whom align with head coach Sean Payton's vision. Overall Grade: C+
The Lions focused on building depth and addressing needs with selections like Tyleik Williams and Tate Ratledge. Both players add size and intensity to their respective positions. The draft also included intriguing picks like defensive end Ahmed Hassanein and wide receiver Isaac TeSlaa, each bringing valuable skills to the roster. Overall Grade: B-
The Green Bay Packers capitalized on the availability of speedy wide receiver Matthew Golden, enhancing their offense around quarterback Jordan Love. The addition of versatile pass-catcher Savion Williams and lineman Anthony Belton bolsters their offensive line. This draft was a significant win for the Packers, setting them up for success. Overall Grade: B
Despite a quiet first day, the Texans emerged with a solid draft class, including tackle Aireontae Ersery and wide receivers Jayden Higgins and Jaylin Noel. This class addresses immediate needs while also setting the stage for future success. The Texans improved their depth and team dynamics significantly with these selections. Overall Grade: B+
The Colts' draft strategy centered on supporting their running game, selecting tight end Tyler Warren to enhance the offense. The addition of edge rusher JT Tuimoloau and running back DJ Giddens also adds to their overall talent pool. However, the Colts missed opportunities to bolster their offensive line significantly. Overall Grade: C+
The Jaguars made a bold move by trading up to select Travis Hunter, a highly touted prospect. While he brings significant potential, the investment demands immediate results. The Jaguars also added promising players like corner Caleb Ransaw and tackle Wyatt Milum, enhancing their roster depth. Overall Grade: B-
The Chiefs executed a masterful draft strategy, trading down to select Josh Simmons, a tackle who fills a crucial need. Their later picks added depth with players like Omarr Norman-Lott and Ashton Gillotte. Despite the lack of offensive line reinforcements, the Chiefs’ overall approach was effective and yielded a strong draft class. Overall Grade: A-
The Raiders underwent significant transformations this offseason, highlighted by their selection of Ashton Jeanty, a potential superstar running back. Their draft class included solid contributors like wide receiver Jack Bech and cornerback Darien Porter. This draft represents a renaissance for the franchise, setting them up for future success. Overall Grade: A
The Chargers focused on adding toughness and playmaking ability, selecting running back Omarion Hampton and skill-position players Tre Harris, KeAndre Lambert-Smith, and Oronde Gadsden II. Their draft strategy enhances their offensive capabilities while maintaining a strong defense. Overall Grade: B
The Rams traded out of the first round, aiming for future gains. Their selections included tight end Terrance Ferguson and edge rusher Josiah Stewart, but some decisions raised questions. While the Rams have a history of turning underwhelming drafts into success, this class could be a challenging one. Overall Grade: C
The Dolphins' selection of Kenneth Grant at No. 13 was a surprising choice, perhaps too high for a player who hasn't consistently dominated. However, they added valuable depth with picks like guard Jonah Savaiinaea and intriguing late-round prospects Ollie Gordon and Quinn Ewers. Overall Grade: D+
The Vikings opted for a more conservative approach, selecting blocker Donovan Jackson in the first round. Their strategy shifted in later rounds, where they focused on addressing needs with picks like defensive tackle Tyrion Ingram-Dawkins. While their draft was logical, it lacked excitement. Overall Grade: C
The Patriots made numerous selections, including left tackle Will Campbell at No. 4 overall, which bolsters their offensive line. They also enhanced their roster with players like running back TreVeyon Henderson and center Jared Wilson. This foundational draft will help the Patriots re-establish their competitive edge. Overall Grade: A-
The Saints continued to invest in their offensive line, drafting Kelvin Banks Jr. to add flexibility and depth. With the selection of quarterback Tyler Shough, they took a calculated risk on a talented passer. Their middle-round picks, including linebacker Danny Stutsman, were also impressive. Overall Grade: B
The Giants made a bold statement by selecting speed rusher Abdul Carter at No. 3 overall while also trading back into the first round for quarterback Jaxson Dart. This dual approach strengthens their defense and future at quarterback. Their middle-round selections were wise, adding depth and readiness to the roster. Overall Grade: A-
The Jets focused on physicality with their first-round selection, Armand Membou, to fortify their offensive line. They also added playmaking tight end Mason Taylor and solid cornerback Azareye'h Thomas. Their Day 3 picks also included safety Malachi Moore, showcasing depth and talent. Overall Grade: B-
The Eagles made a significant addition by selecting linebacker Jihaad Campbell at No. 31 overall, enhancing their defense. Later selections, including safety Andrew Mukuba and linemen Ty Robinson and Drew Kendall, continue to enrich their already strong roster. Overall Grade: A-
The Steelers maintained their focus on size and toughness by selecting Derrick Harmon in the first round. Their middle-round picks, including edge rusher Jack Sawyer and running back Kaleb Johnson, reflect their commitment to building a strong, gritty team. Overall Grade: B
The 49ers took a risk with their draft, selecting players like Mykel Williams and Alfred Collins who possess high upside but come with concerns. They also added running back Jordan James, who could become a valuable asset. Overall Grade: C+
The Seahawks made a strategic choice by selecting versatile blocker Grey Zabel early, followed by impactful selections like safety Nick Emmanwori and quarterback Jalen Milroe. Their draft class stands out for its balance and potential, positioning them well for the future. Overall Grade: A
The Buccaneers executed a double-dipping strategy by focusing on receiver, cornerback, and edge rusher. Their selection of Emeka Egbuka adds a promising future talent, enhancing their offense. However, their lack of investment in the offensive line was surprising. Overall Grade: B-
The Titans addressed their quarterback needs by selecting Cam Ward but needed more established pass-catchers. Their draft also included promising defenders like Oluwafemi Oladejo and Kevin Winston Jr., focusing on potential rather than immediate results. Overall Grade: B
The Commanders made a strategic choice in selecting athletic offensive lineman Josh Conerly Jr. to improve their blocking. They also added speed with wide receiver Jaylin Lane and cornerback Trey Amos, enhancing their overall depth. Overall Grade: B
In conclusion, the 2025 NFL Draft showcased various strategies and approaches by different teams, highlighting the importance of careful planning and execution in building a successful roster. Time will ultimately reveal how effective each team's decisions were, but the initial grades offer a glimpse into their potential futures.
