President Trump faces a new legal hurdle over his use of a wartime law to deport Venezuelan gang members. A Manhattan court intervenes, pausing removals for now. What’s next in this unfolding drama?
In a contentious 5-4 ruling, the Supreme Court allows the Trump administration to deport alleged gang members under wartime law, but they must have the right to challenge their removal. This decision marks a significant victory for Trump, raising concerns among dissenting justices about the implications for judicial power and individual rights.
The Supreme Court has ruled in favor of the Trump administration, allowing the deportation of Venezuelan migrants under an 18th-century law but requiring court hearings to challenge removals. This controversial decision has ignited debate over judicial authority and immigration policy.
In a significant ruling, a federal appeals court has upheld an order preventing the Trump administration from deporting Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador, citing legal concerns over the use of the Alien Enemies Act. This case highlights the tensions between the White House and the judiciary.
A federal appellate court has ruled against the Trump administration's attempt to deport Venezuelan nationals under a 1798 wartime law, sparking a legal battle that could reach the Supreme Court.
In a bold move, the Trump administration defends its use of wartime powers to deport Venezuelan migrants, citing safety risks. This comes despite a judge's block and Venezuela's denial of gang affiliations. Legal experts warn of escalating tensions with the judiciary.