In a pivotal court hearing, a federal judge reviewed the legality of President Trump's attempt to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook over alleged mortgage misrepresentations. The outcome could redefine presidential power over the Fed.
In a groundbreaking move, President Trump has cut $4.9 billion in foreign aid without Congress's approval, utilizing a tactic not seen in nearly 50 years. This controversial decision raises questions about presidential power and the future of U.S. foreign aid.
In a heated cabinet meeting, President Trump asserted his power to deploy the National Guard in any state, challenging Illinois Governor JB Pritzker's stance on crime. Trump’s comments raise questions about presidential authority and state rights.
In a bold move, Trump threatens Brazil with a staggering 50% tariff on imports, tying it to the legal woes of former President Jair Bolsonaro. This escalates his controversial trade war strategy and raises legal questions about presidential authority.
President Trump's recent airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities without congressional approval have ignited a fierce debate over constitutional authority. Lawmakers express concern over the president's unilateral actions, raising questions about the balance of power in U.S. military engagements.
President Trump has ordered U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, raising questions about presidential authority and the need for congressional approval. Dive into the legal debates and implications of this controversial decision.
Donald Trump's administration seeks Supreme Court intervention to lift a ruling blocking mass job cuts across federal agencies, arguing it is within presidential authority. This follows a judge's decision siding with unions and local governments against the layoffs.
In a significant ruling, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has paused the Trump administration's plans to cut the federal workforce, citing constitutional limits on presidential powers. This decision follows a lawsuit from labor unions and cities.
In a significant ruling, the 9th Circuit Court has frozen President Trump's mass firings directive at multiple agencies, marking a setback for his plans to reshape the federal government. The court emphasized that such drastic measures require congressional authorization.
A federal judge has temporarily halted Trump's sweeping government overhaul, siding with unions and local governments against mass layoffs. This ruling raises questions about presidential authority in federal agency restructuring.