Donald Trump's challenge to end birthright citizenship faces scrutiny at the Supreme Court. The outcome could reshape immigration policy and provoke further legal battles over executive authority.
The Supreme Court is set to hear a pivotal case regarding the Trump administration's birthright citizenship policy. This decision could redefine citizenship for thousands of newborns across the U.S., depending on their parents' legal status.
Today, the Supreme Court hears arguments on Trump's executive order challenging birthright citizenship. Meanwhile, the administration's controversial policies on Syria and student loans are stirring debate.
The Supreme Court hears pivotal arguments on birthright citizenship as the Trump administration challenges the constitutional guarantee of citizenship for U.S.-born babies. The outcome could reshape immigration law and civil rights.
In a surprising turn, President Trump has prioritized asylum for white South African farmers, shifting U.S. refugee policy amid criticism. This controversial move raises questions about the treatment of other refugees.
The Supreme Court will hear a pivotal case this Thursday regarding President Trump's executive order aimed at limiting birthright citizenship. This decision could reshape U.S. citizenship laws and impact thousands of families.
In a surprising move, California Governor Gavin Newsom plans to unveil a budget that cuts health care benefits for undocumented immigrants, marking a significant shift from his promises of universal health care for all. This proposal, aimed at addressing a $16 billion shortfall, will freeze enrollment and introduce new premiums for certain adults, raising concerns about the future of immigrant health coverage in the state.
In a surprising turn, Gov. Gavin Newsom's revised budget proposal for 2025-26 alters free healthcare for low-income undocumented immigrants, requiring $100 monthly premiums and freezing new applications. This decision aims to mitigate rising costs amid a looming state deficit.
In a bold stand for racial justice, the Episcopal Church terminates its 40-year partnership with the U.S. government, rejecting a controversial request to resettle white Afrikaners from South Africa. Bishop Sean Rowe emphasizes the moral implications of prioritizing Afrikaners over other long-vetted refugees.
In a bold move, the Episcopal Church refuses to help resettle white South African refugees, citing a commitment to racial justice. This decision ends a long-standing partnership with the federal government amidst controversy over preferential treatment for certain refugees.
