BREAKINGON

Trump Files $15 Billion Defamation Lawsuit Against The New York Times and Penguin Random House

9/16/2025
In a bold move, Donald Trump has launched a $15 billion defamation lawsuit against The New York Times and Penguin Random House, claiming their coverage of his 2024 campaign has harmed his reputation and unfairly influenced public perception. The lawsuit highlights alleged falsehoods and a biased editorial stance against Trump.
Trump Files $15 Billion Defamation Lawsuit Against The New York Times and Penguin Random House
Trump sues The New York Times and Penguin Random House for $15 billion, claiming defamation over their coverage of his 2024 campaign. Legal battle heats up as Trump defends his reputation.

Trump Files Federal Defamation Lawsuit Against The New York Times and Penguin Random House

On Monday, former President Donald Trump initiated a federal defamation lawsuit against the New York Times, four of its reporters, and Penguin Random House over their coverage of his 2024 campaign. The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, which encompasses the area where Trump resides outside of the White House. In this legal action, Trump accused the newspaper of attempting to undermine his reputation as a businessman, derail his campaign, and bias judges and juries against him.

Key Figures in the Lawsuit

The lawsuit names four reporters as defendants: Susanne Craig, Russ Buettner, Peter Baker, and Michael S. Schmidt. Additionally, it highlights that Penguin Random House published a book by Craig and Buettner titled Lucky Loser: How Donald Trump Squandered His Father's Fortune and Created the Illusion of Success. Notably, Schmidt, Craig, and Baker have previously served as analysts for MSNBC or NBC News, which Trump claims adds to their bias against him.

Allegations of Defamation

The lawsuit alleges that the New York Times has consistently spread false and defamatory content about President Trump. It further claims that the newspaper has refused to acknowledge his significant political achievements, specifically his victory in the 2024 election. One focal point of the lawsuit is a New York Times editorial that endorsed Democratic opponent Kamala Harris. The editorial board allegedly made baseless claims that Trump would "defy the norms and dismantle the institutions that have made our country strong."

Long-Form Articles and Editorial Bias

In addition to the editorial, the lawsuit references three long-form articles published by the Times in 2024 that challenged the narratives surrounding Trump's success as a businessman. These articles reportedly examined past scandals and painted a picture of Trump's character that could lead the Oval Office towards dictatorship. The filing claims that the Times has become a "full-throated mouthpiece for the Democrat Party," engaging in what it describes as "industrial-scale defamation and libel against political opponents."

Responses from The New York Times and Penguin Random House

As of early Tuesday, neither the New York Times, Penguin Random House, nor the reporters named in the lawsuit had responded to requests for comment. NBC News reached out to MSNBC for a statement regarding the allegations. The lawsuit also includes correspondence sent by Trump's lawyers to both the New York Times and Penguin Random House in October, along with responses from the legal teams representing the two media entities.

Legal Correspondence and Defense

In the letter directed at the Times, Trump's legal team demanded that the newspaper cease and desist from making what they termed false and defamatory statements about the former president. This letter detailed a series of complaints regarding the Times' coverage. In response, newsroom lawyer David McCraw defended the reporting associated with the articles in question, stating that Trump's complaints were largely personal grievances against the newspaper and its reporters. McCraw argued that the notion of unfavorable reporting being equated with "sabotage" undermines the principles of a democratic society where free exchange of information is essential.

Penguin Random House's Position

Carolyn K. Foley, senior vice president and associate general counsel at Penguin Random House, also addressed Trump's lawyer, Edward Andrew Paltzik, asserting that the unfavorable views expressed by the authors of the book do not constitute a valid basis for a defamation claim.

Seeking Substantial Damages

The lawsuit seeks a staggering $15 billion in compensatory damages for the alleged defamation, alongside unspecified punitive damages. As this legal battle unfolds, it raises essential questions about media coverage, political discourse, and the implications of defamation in the context of high-profile political figures.

Breakingon.com is an independent news platform that delivers the latest news, trends, and analyses quickly and objectively. We gather and present the most important developments from around the world and local sources with accuracy and reliability. Our goal is to provide our readers with factual, unbiased, and comprehensive news content, making information easily accessible. Stay informed with us!
© Copyright 2025 BreakingOn. All rights reserved.