In a significant move, the House Judiciary Committee is set to hold a hearing early next week to examine the growing concerns surrounding activist judges. This development comes as the Trump administration has faced numerous injunctions from various district court judges across the United States, impacting a wide range of policy decisions. Sources familiar with the discussions confirmed this update to Fox News Digital.
House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan, a Republican from Ohio, confirmed the intention to hold these hearings shortly after Fox News Digital reported the news. During an appearance on Fox News' America’s Newsroom, Jordan expressed his commitment to addressing the issues raised by these judicial actions.
In addition to the upcoming hearings, Jordan indicated that a House-wide vote is anticipated next week regarding a bill proposed by Rep. Darrell Issa, a Republican from California. This legislation aims to prevent district judges from issuing nationwide injunctions, a move that reflects the frustrations within the Republican Party regarding the judicial system's impact on the Trump administration's agenda.
Jordan has been a steadfast ally of President Donald Trump in the House, and Issa previously served in Trump's first administration. Two sources mentioned that while a vote on Issa’s bill is expected soon, discussions are ongoing, and the timeline remains fluid.
As the administration grapples with various legal challenges, some conservatives are advocating for impeachment as a means to hold judges accountable for obstructing Trump’s policies. A resolution introduced by Rep. Brandon Gill, a Republican from Texas, has garnered attention from House GOP leadership, particularly after Trump called for the impeachment of U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg.
Judge Boasberg is at the center of controversy after issuing a 14-day emergency injunction on Trump’s use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport members of the Tren De Aragua gang to a prison in El Salvador. This legal standoff has intensified as the White House navigates the implications of Boasberg’s ruling.
Sources revealed that Trump has shown interest in Issa's bill, indicating that he supports efforts to curb the power of judges who issue sweeping injunctions. Gill, who has developed a close relationship with the president, expressed hope for the bill's passage through the regular committee process. However, it remains uncertain whether these plans have shifted, given the House leadership's preference for Issa's proposal.
Some conservative lawmakers who have filed impeachment resolutions—such as Reps. Andy Ogles from Tennessee, Andrew Clyde from Georgia, and Eli Crane from Arizona—could classify their resolutions as privileged. This classification would compel House GOP leaders to address these resolutions within two legislative days.
Despite the momentum for impeachment discussions, House leaders are cautious about pursuing this route due to the complicated political landscape. Many believe that any impeachment measure would likely face challenges in the Senate, potentially rendering it ineffective.
During his interview on Fox News, Jordan praised Issa's bill, although his office did not immediately respond to requests for further comments. The developments in the House Judiciary Committee reflect ongoing tensions between the legislative and judicial branches, particularly regarding the balance of power in shaping national policy.
