If you’ve dedicated time to planning for your retirement, you're likely familiar with the key aspects of Social Security. Most individuals can begin claiming benefits at age 62, reach their full retirement age (FRA) between 66 and 67 depending on their birth year, and can opt to delay benefits until age 70. The longer you postpone claiming, the larger your monthly payments become — delaying past your FRA can increase your benefits by up to 8% per year, as stated by the Social Security Administration (SSA). While this sounds advantageous, the reality of making this decision is far more intricate. For some retirees, waiting could end up costing them financially.
The fundamental issue with the “basic math” behind delaying Social Security benefits is that it often fails to consider longevity risk. While waiting longer to claim can increase your monthly benefits, your total lifetime payout could be lower if you don’t live as long as anticipated. For instance, if you choose to start collecting benefits at age 70 but pass away at 72, you would have only received two years of payments. On the other hand, claiming earlier—even at a reduced rate—might have resulted in a larger total payout over your lifetime. If you were to pass away before reaching age 70, you would effectively receive nothing from a system into which you have contributed for years.
Estimating longevity is inherently uncertain. According to the Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker, the average life expectancy in the U.S. is approximately 78.4 years, but individual outcomes can vary widely. Many individuals live well into their 80s and 90s, while others may not even reach the average life expectancy. To navigate this uncertainty, many financial advisors utilize a breakeven age analysis. This calculation determines the age at which the cumulative benefits from delaying Social Security surpass those of claiming earlier. For example, an individual eligible for $2,000 per month at their full retirement age of 67 would need to live until approximately 78 years and eight months to break even compared to claiming at 62. If they choose to wait until age 70, the breakeven age increases to about 80 years and five months.
Opportunity costs play a crucial role in retirement planning when considering Social Security benefits. If you retire at 62 but delay claiming until 67, you may need to depend on withdrawals from your savings or tax-advantaged accounts like a 401(k) to cover living expenses. This approach forgoes the potential investment returns those funds could generate if left untouched. When incorporating opportunity costs into your breakeven analysis, the age at which delaying benefits becomes beneficial can extend significantly. For instance, an individual eligible for $2,000 per month at a full retirement age of 67, assuming a 5% annual return on investments, would need to live approximately 88 years and eight months to achieve breakeven. With an expected return of 8% annually, the breakeven point may not even be reached within a typical lifespan.
Given that the basic math behind Social Security decisions often overlooks critical variables—and that estimating factors like investment returns or longevity is inherently uncertain—working with a qualified financial advisor can be a wise choice. A professional planner can assist you in accounting for additional considerations such as inflation, estate planning, healthcare costs, and annual spending needs. The takeaway is clear: oversimplifying your retirement strategy could lead to costly mistakes. A more comprehensive and personalized approach can help you make better-informed decisions, ultimately enhancing your long-term financial outcomes.
At Moneywise, we prioritize the production of accurate and trustworthy content that individuals can rely on for their financial decisions. We utilize vetted sources, including government data, financial records, and expert interviews, while highlighting credible third-party reporting when appropriate. Our commitment to transparency and accountability ensures that we correct errors openly and adhere to the highest standards of journalistic integrity.
